ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi
And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Thank you both for your replies. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. if you want can you test this too :) 1. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. Sign in may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . Not associated with Microsoft. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Tested on 1.0.77. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. DiskGenius EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Sorry for the late test. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Download non-free firmware archive. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. It looks cool. Click Bootable > Load Boot File. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. Just some of my thoughts: can u fix now ? only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. GRUB mode fixed it! Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). ", same error during creating windows 7 Windows 10 32bit V4 is legacy version. Menu. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? It does not contain efi boot files. Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. You can change the type or just delete the partition. When the user select option 1. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. () no boot file found for uefi. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and How to suppress iso files under specific directory . 7. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. @steve6375 But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. Paragon ExtFS for Windows https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Boot net installer and install Debian. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? 1. I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've Ventoy just create a virtual cdrom device based on the ISO file and chainload to the bootx64.efi/shim.efi inside the ISO file. Thnx again. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. try 1.0.09 beta1? The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. 3. So I apologise for that. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Already on GitHub? And that is the right thing to do. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. . You signed in with another tab or window. Do I need a custom shim protocol? Tried it yesterday. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error.